Kansas
learn about our work in Kansas
learn about our work in Kansas
All Cases
13 Kansas Cases
Kansas
Jul 2016
Belenky v. Kobach
On September 21, 2013 the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Kansas filed a lawsuit challenging Kansas’ two-tiered voter registration system. The complaint charges that eligible voters are being divided into separate and unequal classes, in violation of the Kansas Constitution’s equal protection guarantees.
Status: Ongoing
View case
Kansas
Voting Rights
Belenky v. Kobach
On September 21, 2013 the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Kansas filed a lawsuit challenging Kansas’ two-tiered voter registration system. The complaint charges that eligible voters are being divided into separate and unequal classes, in violation of the Kansas Constitution’s equal protection guarantees.
Jul 2016
Status: Ongoing
View case
Kansas
Jan 2015
Marie v. Moser - Freedom to Marry in Kansas
The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Kansas have filed a lawsuit against district court clerks in Douglas and Sedgwick counties for their refusal to issue marriage applications to two same-sex couples, despite the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals lifting its stay on marriage for same-sex couples.
Status: Closed (Judgment)
View case
Kansas
LGBTQ Rights
Marie v. Moser - Freedom to Marry in Kansas
The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Kansas have filed a lawsuit against district court clerks in Douglas and Sedgwick counties for their refusal to issue marriage applications to two same-sex couples, despite the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals lifting its stay on marriage for same-sex couples.
Jan 2015
Status: Closed (Judgment)
View case
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2013
Kansas v. Cheever
Whether the Fifth Amendment imposes any limits on the state’s ability to introduce evidence derived from a court-ordered psychiatric examination of the defendant by the state’s expert.
Status: Closed (Judgment)
View case
U.S. Supreme Court
Smart Justice
+2 Issues
Kansas v. Cheever
Whether the Fifth Amendment imposes any limits on the state’s ability to introduce evidence derived from a court-ordered psychiatric examination of the defendant by the state’s expert.
Aug 2013
Status: Closed (Judgment)
View case
Stay informed about our latest work in the courts
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU's privacy statement.