Religious Liberty issue image

Trinity Lutheran Church v. Pauley

Location: Missouri
Court Type: U.S. Supreme Court
Status: Closed (Judgment)
Last Update: June 26, 2017

What's at Stake

Whether a state may exclude houses of worship from a cash grant program in order to avoid any taxpayer subsidy for religion.

Summary

Missouri established a program to provide direct cash grants to qualified nonprofits that wished to purchase scrap tires to resurface their playgrounds that excluded churches and other houses of worship. The lower court held that Missouri’s decision was constitutionally permissible as a means of avoiding any taxpayer subsidy for religion. The ACLU amicus brief argues that Missouri’s decision was, in fact, constitutionally required. The Framers were acutely concerned by the use of taxpayer dollars to support religion and the Establishment Clause therefore prohibits direct cash grants to houses of worship. Here, that concern is especially relevant because of the church’s unwillingness to certify that the refurbished playground would not be used for religious exercises or teaching.

Update (6/26/17): The Supreme Court reversed and ruled in favor of Trinity Lutheran Church.

Press Releases

News & Commentary

Support our on-going ligitation and work in the courts Donate now

Learn more about the issues in this case