Free Speech

Elonis v. United States

Court Type: U.S. Supreme Court
Status: Closed (Judgment)
Last Update: August 22, 2014

What's at Stake

Whether the government is required to prove that someone prosecuted for making threatening statements intended his words to be taken as a threat.

Summary

What the Supreme Court has called “true threats” are not protected by the First Amendment. The question in this case is whether the constitutional definition of a “true threat” includes both a subjective element (the speaker intended his words to be taken as a threat) as well as an objective element (a reasonable listener would have understood the words as a threat). In its amicus brief, the ACLU argues that proof of subjective intent is required to ensure that protected speech is not chilled by the fear of criminal prosecution.

Press Releases

Support our on-going ligitation and work in the courts Donate now

Learn more about the issues in this case