Law Requiring Insurers to Cover Contraceptives Promotes Women’s Health and Reduces Discrimination, ACLU and NYCLU Say
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ALBANY – The American Civil Liberties Union and the New York Civil Liberties Union today said a New York state law requiring insurance companies to include contraceptive coverage in drug benefit packages promotes women’s health and is an important step toward ending gender discrimination in insurance coverage. The organizations voiced support for the law as argument got underway today in court.
“This law strikes a careful balance, promoting women’s health and ending gender discrimination while appropriately protecting religious freedoms,” said Diana Kasdan, a staff attorney with the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project. “Religiously affiliated organizations that employ and serve people of diverse beliefs and provide social services — for example, medical care — do not have a right to discriminate by refusing to cover basic health services for female employees.”
The law in question, the Women’s Health and Wellness Act, requires insurance companies to cover women’s preventive health care, including mandating that insurance plans that cover prescription drugs do not exclude contraceptives from that coverage. The law exempts religious employers, such as churches, mosques, and temples, whose main purpose is to promote a particular religious faith and who primarily employ and serve people who share their religious beliefs.
“Courts have made it clear that health insurers may not discriminate against women,” said Elisabeth Benjamin, director of the NYCLU’s Reproductive Rights Project. “Studies show that insured women pay 68 percent more in out-of-pocket costs than insured men. The Women’s Health and Wellness Act puts women on equal footing with men when it comes to health insurance coverage.”
In January 2006, a lower court found that the law protects women’s health and rights and upheld the law as constitutional. The ACLU and the NYCLU have filed friend-of-the-court briefs at every step of the challenge, including in the Court of Appeals for the State of New York, which is hearing today’s argument.
Ten religiously affiliated organizations brought the challenge against the Women’s Health and Wellness Act. The organizations include Catholic Charities of Albany and Ogdensburg and other Catholic and Baptist social service organizations.
In a related case, in October 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court turned down a request by Catholic Charities in California to review a state supreme court decision upholding a similar California law, the California Women’s Contraceptive Equity Act. Like New York’s law, California’s requires employers that provide prescription drug benefits to include contraceptive coverage and includes a similarly tailored exemption for religious institutions. The ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the California case as well.
Today’s case is Catholic Charities v. Serio, Case No. 96621. Lawyers on the ACLU and NYCLU brief include Kasdan, and Julie Sternberg of the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project and Benjamin, Arthur Eisenberg and Galen Sherwin of the NYCLU.
Every month, you'll receive regular roundups of the most important civil rights and civil liberties developments. Remember: a well-informed citizenry is the best defense against tyranny.
The latest in Reproductive Freedom
An Idaho College Censored Their Reproductive Health Care Art, But These Artists Won’t be Silenced
No One Should Face the Death Penalty for Accessing Health Care
The Women Who Made ACLU History
Physicians and Advocates File Opposition To Attorney General’s Request to Enforce Guam’s 1990 Total Abortion Ban
The American Civil Liberties Union is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.
Learn More About Reproductive Freedom
The ACLU works to ensure that every person can make the best decision for themselves and their family about whether and when to have a child without undue political interference.