Federal Court Temporarily Blocks Tennessee’s Medically Unsound Medication Abortion “Reversal” Law

Despite Medical Experts Agreeing There is No Evidence that a Medication Abortion can be “Reversed,” Politicians Pushed Harmful Law in an Attempt to Force Providers to Lie to Patients

September 30, 2020 9:00 am

Media Contact
125 Broad Street
18th Floor
New York, NY 10004
United States

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — A federal district court in Tennessee temporarily blocked from going into effect a law that would have forced providers to share false and misleading information with patients about the potential to “reverse” a medication abortion — an unproven and politically-motivated claim that has no basis in medical research. By passing a law that would force doctors to share misinformation not backed up by credible science, politicians are trying to steer patients to unproven, experimental medical treatments and erode trust between patients and their providers.

Nashville District Attorney Glenn Funk, one of the state officials charged with enforcing this harmful law, recently filed a declaration with the court saying that he “will not enforce” the new law because it is “unconstitutional” and “criminal law must not be used by the state to exercise control over a woman’s body.” Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery tried to block Funk’s filing.

The law was set to go into effect on Oct. 1, 2020. If it had, providers would have been forced to share this misinformation with patients at least 48 hours in advance of providing a medication abortion, again after the patient had taken the first medication, as well as post misleading signs with large, bold print informing patients about medication abortion “reversal.” Under the law, providers who did not comply would have faced criminal prosecution for a Class E felony, punishable by one to six years in prison. Facilities also faced a $10,000 fine per day for providing abortions while failing to display the required, misleading signage.

Statements from the groups are below:

Statement from Andrew Beck, senior staff attorney with the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project:
“It shouldn’t be controversial to expect the information you receive from a medical professional to be accurate and based in science. The intent of the law is clear: to shame, humiliate, and deceive people who have decided to have an abortion. We stand in relief with Tennessee patients who will be spared in the immediate term from this medically baseless, plainly unconstitutional law — and we will continue to fight until it is struck down for good.”

Statement from Hedy Weinberg, executive director for the ACLU of Tennessee:
“This decision is a victory for patients, who rightfully expect factual and clear information from their personal doctors. Politicians should not be allowed to force physicians to provide false and misleading information to their patients. We will continue to stand strong against our governor’s continued attempts to interfere in patients’ right to access safe reproductive health care.”

Statement from Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America:
“Laws like these are designed with one purpose in mind: to mislead, intimidate, and shame patients seeking an abortion by stigmatizing comprehensive reproductive health care. Threatening doctors with jail time in order to push a political agenda is unconscionable. Gov. Lee has been looking for any excuse to dismantle access to safe, legal abortion in Tennessee. This is another failed attack. We will continue standing with our partners and fighting for our patients, no matter what.”

Statement from Ashley Coffield, CEO of Planned Parenthood of Tennessee and North Mississippi:
“This law was one dangerous part of an abortion ban bill Tennessee politicians pushed through in the dead of night, as our state was grappling with the beginnings of a pandemic and a reckoning with racial injustice in our communities. After all, this is how anti-abortion politicians carry out the Trump administration’s agenda against our rights and freedoms — without public input and against the will of the people. Today is a victory in blocking another failed policy peddled by Gov. Lee, but the fight has just begun. Every person deserves access to medically accurate information and we will continue standing on the side of truth and science, for our patients.”

Statement from Nancy Northup, president & CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights:
“This law is a blatant free speech violation, forcing doctors to provide their patients with misleading and false information about abortion. We will keep fighting this law until it is struck down for good. There is no credible scientific evidence to support the claim that medication abortion can be reversed. Forcing doctors to say otherwise puts patients at risk.”

Statement from Rebecca Terrell, Executive Director at Memphis Center for Reproductive Health (CHOICES):
“Our patients depend on us for honest, evidence-based care. We’re glad we aren’t forced to deceive them with quackery —- at least not yet.”

Since 2015, politicians across the country have passed similar laws trying to force providers to promote the medically inaccurate idea that a medication abortion can be “reversed” — a debunked claim based on junk science peddled by anti-abortion researchers. Similar abortion “reversal” laws have been opposed by leading medical groups, including the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American College for Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Last year, courts blocked similar laws in North Dakota and Oklahoma. No one benefits from forcing providers to share misinformation with patients, who rely on their providers to help them make informed medical decisions.

Earlier this year, Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee attempted to exploit the COVID-19 pandemic to ban abortion, despite opposition from leading national medical groups. In April, that attempt was blocked in court after a lawsuit was filed by the same organizations litigating today’s case.

Tennessee has numerous additional abortion restrictions on the books, including a ban on the use of telehealth for medication abortion; a mandatory 48-hour waiting period (which includes a requirement that forces patients to delay care by adding a medically unnecessary trip to the clinic to receive state-mandated information); limits on when private and public insurance can cover abortion services; and a requirement that minors obtain parental consent.

The lawsuit was brought by Planned Parenthood of Tennessee and North Mississippi, Knoxville Center for Reproductive Health, Memphis Center for Reproductive Health (“CHOICES”), and carafem — represented by Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the Center for Reproductive Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the ACLU of Tennessee.


Sign up to be the first to hear about how to take action.

Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release