Federal Court Rules Law That Undermined Voting Rights Restoration Is Unconstitutional
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — A federal court today ruled that a Florida law that created wealth-based hurdles to voting is unconstitutional. The decision restores voting rights to hundreds of thousands of people with past criminal convictions.
The law, SB 7066, required people with past convictions to pay all outstanding legal fees, cost, fines, and restitution before regaining their right to vote, undermining Floridian’s overwhelming 2018 passage of Amendment 4, which restored voting rights to more than a million people who had completed the terms of their sentence including parole or probation.
U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle found that conditioning voting on payment of legal financial obligations a person is unable to pay violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by discriminating on the basis of wealth.
The case was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Florida, Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law, the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Campaign Legal Center, Southern Poverty Law Center, and the legal firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP.
The following comments are from:
Julie Ebenstein, senior staff attorney with ACLU’s Voting Rights Project: “The court recognized the immense gravity of Florida trying to attach a person’s ability to pay to their right to vote, finding it unconstitutional. This ruling means hundreds of thousands of Floridians will be able to rejoin the electorate and participate in our democracy. This is a massive victory for voting rights.”
Daniel Tilley, ACLU of Florida legal director: “Today’s ruling is a powerful reminder that no one can trump the U.S. Constitution. Our democracy requires that every eligible voter have equitable access to the ballot box. Instead of embracing this founding principle, the Florida Legislature and Gov. DeSantis enacted a modern day poll tax to keep people from accessing this fundamental right. The Constitution is clear — you cannot make voting contingent on wealth. It should alarm Floridians that there are people occupying the highest echelons of political power in our state who fought to keep Florida tied to its racist past and bar people from voting. We are pleased the court saw right through that and rejected this blatantly discriminatory voter suppression scheme. We are grateful to all of our brave clients for speaking out and standing against this discriminatory law. While the State is likely to appeal this decision, we’re ready to take this fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.”
Sean Morales-Doyle, senior counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law: “This is a historic win for voting rights. Judge Hinkle told the state of Florida what the rest of America already knows. You can’t condition the right to vote on a person’s wealth. This ruling opens the way for hundreds of thousands of Floridians to exercise their fundamental right to vote this November — and our democracy will be stronger for their participation.”
Stay Informed
Every month, you'll receive regular roundups of the most important civil rights and civil liberties developments. Remember: a well-informed citizenry is the best defense against tyranny.