Federal Court to Hear Arguments May 29 in Battle Over Government Secrecy About Sept. 11 Detainees
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
WASHINGTON–A federal judge will hear oral arguments tomorrow in a challenge to the federal government’s continued refusal to disclose basic information about those individuals arrested and detained since September 11.
The case, The Center for National Security Studies, et al. vs. DOJ, was filed last December by the American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for National Security Studies and 20 other civil liberties and public access organizations.
Judge Gladys Kessler of the U.S. District Court in Washington will hear argument from each side on Wednesday morning. Kate Martin, Director of the Center for National Security Studies, will argue for the civil liberties groups.
The groups seek the identities of all individuals arrested or detained in connection with the Sept. 11 investigation. The Department of Justice has refused to provide the names of individuals secretly arrested and jailed on immigration charges or those held as material witnesses.
The policy of secret arrests and jailing has been rejected by a state court in New Jersey, and a federal appeals court recently rejected secret immigration hearings in a Michigan case. A similar challenge to closed hearings is underway in New Jersey.
With today’s hearing, the Department of Justice is now forced to defend its policy of mass secret arrests in federal court on a national level.
Every month, you'll receive regular roundups of the most important civil rights and civil liberties developments. Remember: a well-informed citizenry is the best defense against tyranny.
The latest in National Security
The American Civil Liberties Union is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.
Learn More About National Security
The ACLU’s National Security Project is dedicated to ensuring that U.S. national security policies and practices are consistent with the Constitution, civil liberties, and human rights.