ACLU Pleased With Supreme Court Decision to Consider Texas "Sodomy" Law

December 2, 2002 12:00 am

Media Contact
125 Broad Street
18th Floor
New York, NY 10004
United States

ACLU Pleased With Supreme Court Decision to Consider Texas “Sodomy” Law

Statement of Matt Coles, Director of the ACLU Lesbian and Gay Rights Project

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

NEW YORK – The ACLU is very pleased that the Supreme Court has decided to hear arguments in Lawrence v. Texas, a challenge to that state’s law which makes some kinds of sexual intimacy a crime, but only for gay people.

This case provides the Court with the chance to correct the great injustice it did 16 years ago in Bowers v. Hardwick, when it upheld Georgia’s law against “sodomy.”

The ACLU believes that no state should be allowed to intrude into anyone’s bedroom. The Texas law is especially offensive, since it only applies to same-sex couples. The Supreme Court should say once and for all that in America equal protection under the law applies to everyone, including lesbians and gay men.

Laws that criminalize consensual intimacy between lesbians and gay men are very damaging. In the eyes of many, the mere existence of these laws defines lesbians and gay men as criminals. These laws are often used to deny parents custody of their children, stifle the voices of lesbian and gay people in the political process and discriminate against people in the workplace.

These laws also unfairly penalize lesbian and gay people in the criminal justice system. For example, the Supreme Court is now deciding whether to take the case of Matthew Limon, who was convicted of having consensual oral sex with another male when they were both teenagers. Had the other teenager been a girl, Limon would be serving no more that a 15-month sentence. Because Limon is gay, he is now serving a sentence of 17 years in Kansas state prison.

The ACLU departed from its usual practice to urge the Court to consider the claims of Lawrence and Garner, who are ably represented by Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund. It will file a brief now that the Court has taken the case.

Laws like these are repellent to the most basic principles of freedom established in the U.S. Constitution. We hope the Justices use this case to strike them down.

Every month, you'll receive regular roundups of the most important civil rights and civil liberties developments. Remember: a well-informed citizenry is the best defense against tyranny.

Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release