FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: 212-549-2666, media@aclu.org
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court today dismissed a case against Secret Service agents who moved anti-Bush protestors two blocks away from President George W. Bush during a 2004 campaign trip to Oregon. While reaffirming that the First Amendment prohibits the government from discriminating against protesters because of their political views, the Court nonetheless ruled that the agents could not be sued for damages because they were responding to a sudden change in the President’s travel plans that created what the Court described as valid security concerns, and no prior decision had “clearly established” the rule that protestors and supporters must be kept at a comparable distance from the President.
Steven R. Shapiro, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union commented on the court’s decision:
“We are disappointed by today’s ruling. No one disputes that the Secret Service has an overriding interest in protecting the President but that does not include the right to shield the President from criticism, a critical distinction that the Court unanimously reaffirms. In our view, the jury should have been allowed to decide whether this case was actually about security or censorship.”
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: 212-549-2666, media@aclu.org
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court today dismissed a case against Secret Service agents who moved anti-Bush protestors two blocks away from President George W. Bush during a 2004 campaign trip to Oregon. While reaffirming that the First Amendment prohibits the government from discriminating against protesters because of their political views, the Court nonetheless ruled that the agents could not be sued for damages because they were responding to a sudden change in the President’s travel plans that created what the Court described as valid security concerns, and no prior decision had “clearly established” the rule that protestors and supporters must be kept at a comparable distance from the President.
Steven R. Shapiro, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union commented on the court’s decision:
“We are disappointed by today’s ruling. No one disputes that the Secret Service has an overriding interest in protecting the President but that does not include the right to shield the President from criticism, a critical distinction that the Court unanimously reaffirms. In our view, the jury should have been allowed to decide whether this case was actually about security or censorship.”
Stay informed
Every month, you'll receive regular roundups of the most important civil rights and civil liberties developments. Remember: a well-informed citizenry is the best defense against tyranny.
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy policy.
The latest in Free Speech
-
How Officials in Georgia are Suppressing Political Protest as ‘Domestic Terrorism’
-
Congressional Efforts to Ban TikTok in the U.S. Remain a Danger to Free Speech
-
An Idaho College Censored Their Reproductive Health Care Art, But These Artists Won’t be Silenced
-
Florida's "Stop W.O.K.E." Censorship Bill Continues to Be Blocked After Eleventh Circuit Decision
ACLU's Vision
The American Civil Liberties Union is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.
Learn More About Free Speech
Protecting free speech means protecting a free press, the democratic process, diversity of thought, and so much more. The ACLU has worked since 1920 to ensure that freedom of speech is protected for everyone.