Capital Punishment issue image

Hurst v. Florida

Court Type: U.S. Supreme Court
Status: Closed (Judgment)
Last Update: June 17, 2015

What's at Stake

Whether Florida’s death penalty scheme violates the Constitution by allowing the judge, rather than a jury, to make critical factfinding determinations.

Summary

Under Florida law, the existence of aggravating and mitigating factors is determined by the judge during the sentencing phase of a capital case. The jury plays an advisory role only, and even then its recommendation can be based on a simple majority vote. Supporting the defendant’s contention that this system is unconstitutional, the ACLU’s amicus brief focuses on the constitutional requirement of a unanimous jury whose factual findings are dispositive when the state seeks to impose the death penalty.

Support our on-going ligitation and work in the courts Donate now

Learn more about the issues in this case