National Security issue image

Garcetti v. Ceballos

Court Type: U.S. Supreme Court
Status: Closed (Judgment)
Last Update: October 12, 2005

What's at Stake

Reviewing whether a government whistleblower forfeits all First Amendment protection by speaking out in the course of his or her job. DECIDED

Summary

A deputy district attorney in Los Angeles alleged that his superiors retaliated against him for suggesting that a criminal prosecution should be dismissed because it was tainted by police misconduct. Both the county and the United States concede that this speech involved a matter of public concern but argue that it was nonetheless unprotected by the First Amendment because it was made in the course of the plaintiff’s normal job responsibilities. The ACLU’s amicus brief challenges this cramped view of the First Amendment as both unprecedented and unwise.

Press Releases

Support our on-going ligitation and work in the courts Donate now

Learn more about the issues in this case