Smart Justice issue image

Berghuis v. Thompkins

Court Type: U.S. Supreme Court
Status: Closed (Judgment)
Last Update: January 27, 2010

What's at Stake

Whether the police can continue to interrogate a suspect who has been read his Miranda rights but never waived them for several hours when the suspect refuses to respond to any initial questioning and thus effectively asserts his right to remain silent.

Summary

The Miranda warnings are designed to protect criminal suspects from the coercive nature of custodial interrogation. In a brief jointly filed with the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the ACLU argues that the police are not permitted to interrogate a suspect who has not expressly waived his Miranda rights and that there was no implied waiver in this case, assuming an implied waiver is ever permissible, because the defendant remained silent in response to the police interrogation for several hours before he ultimately confessed.

Support our on-going ligitation and work in the courts Donate now

Learn more about the issues in this case